RAPID REVIEWS

Bibliography

1. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J [Internet]. 2009 Jun;26(2):91–108. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

2. Tricco AC, Antony J, Zarin W, Strifler L, Ghassemi M, Ivory J, et al. A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Med [Internet]. 2015 Sep 16;13:224. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6

3. Thigpen S, Puddy RW, Singer HH, Hall DM. Moving knowledge into action: developing the rapid synthesis and translation process within the interactive systems framework. Am J Community Psychol [Internet]. 2012 Dec;50(3-4):285–94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9537-3

4. Roth S. Research guides: Systematic reviews & other review types: What is a rapid review? [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2022 Apr 15]. Available from: https://guides.temple.edu/c.php?g=78618&p=4156608

5. Ganann R, Ciliska D, Thomas H. Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implement Sci [Internet]. 2010 Jul 19;5:56. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-56

6. Booth A. Fifty Shades of Review with Andrew Booth [Internet]. CPD Pilot Program. 2016 [cited 2022 Apr 15]. Available from: https://eahilcpd.wordpress.com/webinar-toolkit/webinar-toolkit-fifty-shades-of-review-with-andrew-booth/

7. Haby MM, Chapman E, Clark R, Barreto J, Reveiz L, Lavis JN. What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review. Health Res Policy Syst [Internet]. 2016 Nov 25;14(1):83. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0155-7

8. Tricco AC, Antony J, Straus SE. Systematic reviews vs. rapid reviews: what’s the difference. Vancouver, Canada: CADTH Rapid Reviews Summit. 2015; https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/events/Andrea-Tricco_RR-vs-Systematic-Reviews_Feb-4-2015.pdf

9. Khangura S, Polisena J, Clifford TJ, Farrah K, Kamel C. Rapid review: an emerging approach to evidence synthesis in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care [Internet]. 2014 Jan;30(1):20–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462313000664

10. Watt A, Cameron A, Sturm L, Lathlean T, Babidge W, Blamey S, et al. Rapid versus full systematic reviews: validity in clinical practice? ANZ J Surg [Internet]. 2008 Nov;78(11):1037–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04730.x

11. Topfer LA, Parada A, Menon D, Noorani H, Perras C, Serra-Prat M. Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Int J Technol Assess Health Care [Internet]. 1999 Spring;15(2):297–303. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10507189

12. Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ [Internet]. 2001 Jul 7 [cited 2022 Apr 15];323(7303):42–6. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/323/7303/42.short?casa_token=YAQ7uRY_9JsAAAAA:3GrBPQPSUxUmDhVvns8qFAWzeUGQDLCutmpYYsN-spdrzj2ZJe1wfmX0HqeEbKYTEvApuXPFSe4D

13. Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 14. Reporting guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst [Internet]. 2006 Dec 8;4:26. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-4-26

14. Watt A, Cameron A, Sturm L, Lathlean T, Babidge W, Blamey S, et al. Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care [Internet]. 2008 Spring;24(2):133–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462308080185

15. Featherstone RM, Dryden DM, Foisy M, Guise J-M, Mitchell MD, Paynter RA, et al. Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews. Syst Rev [Internet]. 2015 Apr 17;4:50. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0040-4

16. Pandor A, Kaltenthaler E, Martyn-St James M, Wong R, Cooper K, Dimairo M, et al. Delphi consensus reached to produce a decision tool for SelecTing Approaches for Rapid Reviews (STARR). J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2019 Oct;114:22–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.005

17. Dobbins M. Rapid review guidebook. Natl Collab Cent Method Tools [Internet]. 2017;13:25. Available from: https://www.nccmt.ca/uploads/media/media/0001/02/800fe34eaedbad09edf80ad5081b9291acf1c0c2.pdf

18. How to do a REA [Internet]. The National Archive. [cited 2022 Apr 16]. Available from: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20140402163101/http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/networks/gsr/resources-and-guidance/rapid-evidence-assessment/how-to-do-a-rea

19. Hartling L, Guise J-M, Kato E, Anderson J, Belinson S, Berliner E, et al. A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2015 Dec;68(12):1451–62.e3. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.036